Elena Verna 3.0 on Growth Tactics That Never Work
Speaker: Elena Verna Source: Lenny’s Podcast Date: c. 2024
Elena Verna — serial operator across Miro, Amplitude, Dropbox, and SurveyMonkey — returns for a third appearance to catalogue 10 growth tactics she sees teams waste resources on repeatedly, three favourite growth frameworks, and a contrarian take on full-time employment.
Key ideas
- 10 tactics that never work. From hiring a growth team too early through colour-optimisation micro-tests, each item reflects a systematic failure mode rather than random bad luck. The unifying diagnosis: shortcuts substitute for doing the hard, foundational work.
- Growth amplifies PMF; it cannot create it. A growth team can lift a healthy business by 10–15%. They cannot reverse a declining one. Before hiring growth, first stop the decline.
- Earned channels over paid. Growth teams that own SEO and SEM are playing in someone else’s distribution. The priority is building an earned channel — virality, user-generated content, referral loops — that no competitor can buy or algorithm can revoke.
- Don’t test everything. Paralysing an entire team behind A/B tests is as much a pathology as never testing. If a sample size takes eight months to collect, don’t test — use pre/post. Reserve experimentation for high-traffic, high-stakes decisions.
- Career optionality as north star. Full-time employment is one item on a menu, not the default. The right question at every career juncture is: does this increase my option pool?
Detailed notes
The 10 tactics
- Hiring a growth team too soon. Founders must drive the first wave of growth to PMF and ~$1–10M ARR. Data must exist before a growth team can function. The longer you wait, the more the whole company learns to own growth.
- Hiring a growth team to fix a declining business. Growth amplifies; it does not reverse trajectories. Stop the decline first, show signs of life, then bring in growth to accelerate.
- Rebrand/homepage redesign to drive acquisition. Every redesign Elena has observed has been a performance step-back, not a step-forward. Net neutral (eventually) is the best case. Budget three to six months of optimisation after launch before expecting recovery.
- Obsessing over or copying competition. Use competitive teardowns for inspiration and to identify elemental patterns, never as a destination. You cannot tell whether their experience is tested or legacy. “Copying competition is the fastest way to mediocrity.”
- Assuming your problem is unique. In growth, every problem — activation drop-off, low virality, monetisation friction — has been solved before. Find the person who solved it. Hire advisors. Patternise solutions.
- Growth team owning paid channels over earned. Organic search, paid ads, and social algorithms are rented distribution. Build owned earned channels: virality, UGC, referral loops. “Algorithm can giveth, but algorithm can also taketh away.” Dropbox — over 50% of acquisition from sharing loops — as exemplar.
- Not overlaying multiple growth models. Product-led, marketing-led, and sales-led growth each have a lifespan. Most loops exhaust their output within five to seven years. Introduce a new model every 18 months. Allocate 20–25% of annual growth team time to exploring the next loop.
- Not hiring advisors. “Any growth team that does not have an advisor is a growth team that is underperforming.” Vet by running a paid workshop on your actual problem before engaging on retainer. Evaluate monthly.
- Over-testing everything. If sample size takes more than a month, use pre/post instead. Data is an input, not a substitute for intuition. Statistical significance at 0.05 is frequently misread as proof. Just go.
- Fire round (four sub-items):
- Colour optimisations: as long as it’s accessible and bright enough, irrelevant to growth.
- Third-party auth for non-developer tools: does not drive incremental acquisition or retention.
- One-off emails: one email will never move any metric. Email is a series with a strategy.
- Simplifying onboarding as a goal: simplification is a solution to a specific problem, never a problem in itself. Cross “simplify onboarding” off your roadmap; replace with the actual problem.
Favourite growth frameworks
- Growth loops (Reforge / Brian Balfour, Casey Winters, Andrew Chen): action → reaction → another action, a self-contained flywheel. The alternative to funnel thinking.
- Race car framework (Lenny Rachitsky & Dan): engines (loops), fuel (paid spend), turbo boosts (one-time large events), pit stops (optimisations). Separates short-term from long-term growth initiatives.
- Adjacent user theory (Bangaly Kaba on Growth, Career, and Adjacent Users): users just outside your ICP who can be brought in with targeted experience optimisations, without expanding PMF.
Contrarian corner
Full-time employment is not the best way to monetise your skills — it is one option on a menu that also includes consulting, fractional roles, interim roles, advising, and building content. Career optionality — the ability to choose what fits your life, skills, and personality at any given moment — is a better north star than title progression. Earn the right to unlock optionality (usually via full-time roles early in career), then start exercising it.