Marc Rowan on Financial Market Evolution and University Governance

Guest:
Marc Rowan — Co-founder and CEO, Apollo Global Management
Host:
Tyler Cowen
Source:
Conversations with Tyler · 6 March 2024

Marc Rowan on Financial Market Evolution and University Governance

Apollo Global Management co-founder and CEO Marc Rowan argues that private credit is not a niche asset class but a $40 trillion redefinition of where credit comes from, that insurance failures are almost always liability failures rather than asset failures, and — drawing on his own fight over University of Pennsylvania governance — that oversized, mandateless university boards have failed for structural reasons a smaller, policy-first board would fix.

Key ideas

  1. Private credit means everything off a bank balance sheet, not a niche product. Rowan distinguishes the popular-press meaning of private credit — below-investment-grade direct lending to buyouts, a $1.5 trillion market — from the market he actually means: all non-bank credit, roughly $40 trillion, spanning ordinary business and consumer loans. The old association of ‘private’ with ‘risky’ and ‘public’ with ‘safe’ no longer holds; both categories now run the full spectrum from AA to levered equity, differing only in liquidity.
  2. Insurance failures come from liabilities, not assets. Reviewing a century of industry losses — asbestos reinsurance, D&O exposure to Enron, GE’s long-term-care book — Rowan argues the asset side has rarely been the weak spot. Athene’s edge comes from confining itself to one simple, well-understood liability, retirement annuities, rather than the diversified risk books that sank traditional insurers.
  3. Moving credit out of banks deleverages the financial system. A bank is levered ten to twelve times; a mutual fund holding the same credit is unlevered. Rowan reframes the shift from bank lending to investment-marketplace lending — now roughly 80 percent of US corporate and consumer credit — as risk dispersion that makes the system more resilient, not evidence of under-regulation.
  4. Post-2008 regulation cut market-making liquidity to one-tenth of its former level, an effect masked by a decade of quantitative easing. Trading capital fell roughly 90 percent after Dodd-Frank while public markets tripled in size. The UK’s 2022 gilt/LDI pension crisis, in which AAA and AA bonds gapped down repeatedly before the Bank of England intervened, is Rowan’s preview of what a genuine risk-off shock does to markets that only look liquid.
  5. University trustee boards fail from size and an absent mandate, not bad faith. Fifty-member boards cannot debate substantively; Penn’s own charter assigns trustees responsibility for admissions standards, faculty promotion, and institutional strategy that a body that size cannot execute. Rowan’s prescription — settle policy first, then hire a president against an explicit plan — treats a university board as a corporate board that had neglected its basic function of setting direction before choosing a leader.

Content

Private credit redefined: from a $1.5 trillion niche to a $40 trillion market

Rowan opens by explaining why higher interest rates help rather than hurt Apollo: roughly $500 billion of its $650 billion in assets is credit, which benefits directly from higher rates short of outright economic distress, while the $150 billion equity book is hedged through fixed-rate and other instruments. The deeper point is definitional. In the popular press, ‘private credit’ means a narrow, below-investment-grade activity — direct lending to leveraged buyouts, a roughly $1.5 trillion market that is ‘sometimes really attractive, sometimes not.’ Rowan’s own usage is far broader: everything not sitting on a bank balance sheet is private credit, a market he sizes at roughly $40 trillion, encompassing ordinary corporate and consumer loans that simply moved from banks to investors. The heuristic that ‘private is risky, public is safe’ held when Rowan started 40 years ago, when private markets meant mainly private equity, venture capital, and hedge funds. It no longer holds: he points to the ten largest S&P 500 stocks, near 35 percent of the index and trading above a 50 P/E, as a case where public and liquid does not mean safe, while private credit today spans the same AA-to-levered-equity range as public markets. ‘Because something is private, no longer means it’s risky,’ he tells Cowen — the operative distinction is liquidity, not credit quality.

Athene and the discipline of liability-driven insurance

Asked why Athene, Apollo’s affiliated insurer, has avoided the duration-risk failures that hit insurers in the 1990s, Rowan reframes the whole question: nearly every major insurance-industry loss over the past century — asbestos reinsurance, D&O coverage of firms like Enron, Japanese earthquake risk, GE’s long-term-care book, mispriced variable annuities — was a liability failure, not an asset failure. Genuine asset-side collapses (he names Executive Life and Mutual Benefit) are rare. Athene’s structural advantage is narrowness: it insures only retirement, through annuities and pensions, rather than life, health, home, auto, and catastrophe risk simultaneously. Those liabilities are simple and locked in, funded by tax-advantaged savings that compound over 5-to-20-year commitments. Success in the category, Rowan argues, requires four things most competitors lack together: capital (surprisingly hard to raise, since public retirement-services firms have mostly paid out book value as dividends rather than reinvesting); long-term, low-cost liabilities (Apollo built scale by buying distressed insurance blocks in the aftermath of 2008, an opportunity no longer available); a scaled, low-cost operating base (Athene runs as a single-product insurer out of Iowa); and the ability to originate the higher-yielding, investment-grade private credit needed to back 20-year promises while maintaining solvency.

Deleveraging by disintermediation: why credit leaving banks makes the system safer

Cowen presses Rowan on whether the shift of credit from banks to investors weakens the Federal Reserve’s grip on the economy, since roughly 80 percent of US credit now flows through investors rather than the 100-percent-bank-intermediated world of the past. Rowan agrees the relationship has become ‘tougher and tougher to pull off’ but rejects the frame that this represents a loss of control rather than a change in mechanism: as rates rise, credit becomes relatively more attractive than equities to investors, preserving an indirect channel of influence. His larger argument is structural. A bank is levered ten to twelve times; the identical loan held inside a mutual fund is unlevered. Every dollar of credit that moves from the banking system into the investment marketplace therefore deleverages the system as a whole — a claim he sets against the US’s unusual advantage of having three sources of capital (equity, bank debt, and a deep fixed-income/private-credit market) where ‘almost every Asian economy’ and Europe still have only two. Pressed on political-economy risk — that state insurance regulation is weaker than federal bank oversight, and that episodes like AIG and money-market funds show dispersion carries its own dangers — Rowan counters with balance-sheet comparisons: Athene holds more capital per dollar of assets than the typical bank and keeps 90 percent investment-grade assets against a bank’s roughly two-thirds, because insurers, unlike banks, carry no federal guarantee, no access to the Fed, and no maturity mismatch to begin with.

The liquidity illusion: Dodd-Frank, trading capital, and the UK pension crisis

The conversation’s sharpest empirical claim concerns market liquidity. Trading capital — the capital dealers hold to make markets — is, in Rowan’s account, roughly one-tenth of its 2008 level, a fall he attributes chiefly to Dodd-Frank, even as public markets have tripled in size, implying something like a thirtyfold reduction in liquidity relative to market size. The effect went unnoticed for over a decade because the same period saw $8 trillion in quantitative easing, which kept nearly every asset appreciating; 2022–23, in his telling, is the first real test of the post-2008 rulebook under stress. He cites the average time to sell an investment-grade corporate bond rising to roughly five days, and points to the UK’s 2022 gilt/LDI pension crisis — where institutions tried to sell AAA and AA obligations, the market gapped down, they tried again, it gapped down further, and the Bank of England had to intervene to stabilise prices — as the clearest live demonstration. Cowen asks why the adjustment shows up almost entirely in quantity (a thirtyfold liquidity drop) rather than price; Rowan’s answer is that the UK episode shows liquidity does still exist, just not near the pre-crisis market price, and he expects sharper price adjustment once markets face a genuine risk-off shock rather than the placid post-2008 decade. The practical upshot he presses on institutional allocators — pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and wealthy individuals alike — is to ask not whether an asset is liquid or illiquid, but whether they are being adequately compensated for giving up liquidity they rarely actually need.

Reforming university governance: Penn’s charter and the case for smaller boards

Rowan is chairman of the Wharton School’s Board of Advisers — Penn no longer uses the older term ‘overseer’ — and was formerly a fiduciary trustee of the University of Pennsylvania itself, one of roughly 50 members. He describes a structural failure common to most university boards: every subsidiary board (Wharton’s included) is purely advisory, but the top-level trustee board is a genuine fiduciary body, and ‘no one tells you’ when a member crosses that line — board behaviour does not change to match the heavier legal duty. With 50 members, Rowan argues, substantive debate becomes nearly impossible, even though Penn’s own charter explicitly assigns trustees responsibility for setting admissions standards, faculty-promotion standards, institutional strategy, and evaluating academic departments — duties he insists are not questions ‘Marc Rowan dreamed up’ but ones posed directly by the university’s founding document. His prescribed fix mirrors ordinary corporate governance: a board should set strategy, tone, and policy, and pick a leader, not micromanage — but Penn’s trustees, he says, never gave its recent presidents a policy roadmap on viewpoint diversity or free speech against which to be judged, leaving them directionless when crises hit. On why academics themselves stay quiet, Rowan attributes faculty caution to career risk tied to tenure and peer standing, while reporting that department chairs across Wharton, engineering, and the medical school privately thanked him for raising these questions publicly — evidence, in his reading, of a large constituency for reform kept silent by fear of professional cost rather than genuine disagreement.

Hiring, decision-making, and running a 200-partner firm

Rowan resists the idea that Apollo over-recruits from elite schools: the firm has moved from a Wharton-heavy origin (50 percent of early hires came from his own alma mater) to full geographic democratisation, with India — roughly 500 people in Mumbai, projected to reach 1,000 within three years — its fastest-growing office. In hiring, he looks past intelligence and credentials toward cultural fit and the ability to work with ‘a blank piece of paper’, since no one is trusted with major decisions in their first two years and technical mastery alone does not predict it. His account of decision-making contrasts equity and credit investing directly: private equity is ‘hours of boredom followed by moments of terror’ — Apollo makes only 10 to 20 equity decisions a year, waiting until an opportunity is right — while credit investing, drawing on Rowan’s own start at Drexel Burnham financing companies of uncertain survival, is a continuous process of taking the ‘least bad alternative’ each day to meet recurring capital needs, such as originating $6–7 billion a month for an insurance client. Running a firm of over 200 partners, he says, requires genuine buy-in rather than top-down dicta: strategic plans are debated, not dictated, because too many consequential decisions happen at levels no single leader can see or absorb.

India, Japan, and personal register

In India, Apollo positions itself between two extremes already well served — abundant local equity capital among wealthy Indian families, and low-cost bank debt — financing scale transactions neither will touch, such as a $750 million loan backing Adani’s acquisition of Mumbai airport. Japan’s ageing, yield-starved retiree population and capital-constrained insurance sector make it, in Rowan’s view, close to an ideal market for Apollo’s private-credit and reinsurance products, independent of the demographic trajectory (Japan’s 1.3, South Korea’s falling-to-0.7 fertility rate) he declines to generalise about outside his own narrow field. Outside finance, Rowan has chaired or co-chaired Darca, Israel’s largest private/charter school network — 50 schools, roughly 30,000 students, chiefly Ethiopian, Yemeni, Druze, Bedouin, and Eastern European communities — which reaches roughly a 90 percent university-matriculation rate by abandoning the standard lecture format entirely, and which he treats as a working laboratory for the pedagogical experimentation he thinks conventional universities have failed to attempt. He closes on lighter register: a fully curved, no-right-angles brutalist Fifth Avenue apartment renovation; admiration for the scale of new construction in Riyadh and Abu Dhabi against the US’s post-war failure to build another Shaker Heights; Apollo’s own office redesign around ‘casual collisions’; and lessons from owning three Long Island restaurants (Duryea’s, Lulu), where undercapitalisation, not the usual food-versus-drink margin cliché, is what he says actually sinks most operators.

See also

See also